Seven Pointed Questions for Corporate Media About Their Biases

We have to ask many questions of our nation’s mainstream media. Listed here are only a few.

1. Why don’t you check with our present healthcare system as a “corporate-run system”? 

At Democratic presidential debates and elsewhere, community TV journalists have aggressively challenged the notion of “abolishing personal medical health insurance”—with out discussing what medical health insurance firms really contribute to healthcare past paperwork and profiteering. Ultimately June’s debate, NBC’s Lester Holt requested candidates to lift their fingers if they’d “abolish personal insurance coverage in favor of a government-run plan.” Again and again, when mainstream journalists check with Medicare for All—whereby the federal government could be the supplier of medical health insurance, while docs and hospitals stay personal—they mislabel it “government-run healthcare” or a “government-run system.” But they by no means name our present system “corporate-run healthcare.”

2. Why don’t you present precise knowledge on the public’s attitudes towards medical health insurance companies?  

A 2016 Harris ballot discovered deep disdain for medical health insurance firms, with solely 16 % believing that these companies put sufferers over earnings. In a 2018 Forbes article on “The High 5 Industries Most Hated by Clients,” the medical health insurance business was ranked fourth (after cable TV, web suppliers and wi-fi cellphone)—based mostly on American Buyer Satisfaction Index rankings. But at Democratic debates, we’ve repeatedly heard from journalists concerning the thousands and thousands of US customers who supposedly relish personal insurance coverage. Whereas I’ve but to satisfy a kind of happy clients, it’s a mantra from media shops (that are usually sponsored by well being insurers). Extra to the purpose: I’ve but to satisfy anybody who would refuse a plan with extra full protection at much less price to her or him: “No, I need my beloved Aetna!”

I’ve but to satisfy anybody who would refuse a plan with extra full protection at much less price to her or him: “No, I need my beloved Aetna!” 

3. Why do you so not often care concerning the views of unions . . . until they’re in battle with environmentalists?  

SANDERS: Every main environmental group has stated no to this new commerce settlement as a result of it doesn’t even have the phrase “local weather change” in it . . .

PANELIST: However, Senator Sanders, to be clear, the AFL-CIO helps this deal. Are you unwilling to compromise?    

4. Why do you additionally invoke unions to forged doubt on Medicare for All? 

Whereas presidential debate panelists (and company Democrats like Joe Biden) have steadily introduced up union-negotiated well being advantages as an argument towards Medicare for All, they not often point out how US unions have sacrificed wage acquires and different advantages to stave off employer cuts to their healthcare.  As flight attendants’ union president Sara Nelson instructed Politico: “Once we’re in a position to hold on to the well being plan we’ve, that’s thought-about a large win. But it surely’s an enormous drag on our bargaining. So our message is: Get it off the desk.” As Biden admitted final week, attaching well being insurance coverage to a job (whether or not unionized or not) is an iffy proposition for any employee.  

5. Why do you interrogate politicians over the value tags of social applications however not warfare?  

CNN devoted the first portion of final week’s debate to warfare, army deployment and international battle — however not one of many 25 questions from CNN journalists requested concerning the price ticket of countless warfare and militarism. This even supposing roughly 57 % of federal discretionary spending goes to the army and Trump retains lavishing more cash on the army than the Pentagon asks for. With regards to warfare spending, mainstream journalists don’t ask: “Can our nation afford it?” 

After CNN’s debate turned from warfare to progressive proposals for social applications benefitting the overwhelming majority of the general public, panelists turned from lapdogs to watchdogs on the difficulty of price. Sanders was requested, “Don’t voters should see a price ticket [on Medicare for All]?” and “How would you retain your plans from bankrupting the nation?” To pound residence the bias visually, CNN’s banners throughout the underside of the display blared: “QUESTION: Does Sanders owe voters an evidence of how a lot his well being care plan will price them and the nation?” And the absurd: “QUESTION: Sanders’ proposals would double federal spending over a decade; how will he keep away from bankrupting the nation?” There have been no banners about army value tags.

6. Why do you probe the prices of reform whereas sidestepping the larger value tags of the established order? 

7. Why do you ignore the 2016 presidential end in your incessant punditry on which Democrats are electable in 2020? 

I’m unaware of a single severe analyst who asserts with a straight face that Hillary Clinton misplaced to a faux-populist in 2016 as a result of voters perceived her as “too far left” or “too radical.” However she clearly did lose votes as a result of she was seen as too established order, too cozy with the company institution. In key swing states, Clinton failed to energise voters of coloration, misplaced younger voters to 3rd events, and misplaced working-class whites who’d voted for Obama and Sanders. Democrats have been defeated in six presidential elections for the reason that Reagan period, however one could be onerous–pressed to discover a single defeat attributable to far-leftism.

Establishment journalists appear intent on ignoring this historical past as they cowl Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. Over the past yr, company shops have repeatedly portrayed progressive reforms as scarily left-wing, within the face of polls displaying they’re broadly in style (not simply with Democrats) — reminiscent of rising taxes on the wealthy (a new Reuters ballot discovered most Republicans favor a wealth tax); free public school and cancelling scholar debt; Medicare for All; and the Inexperienced New Deal.  Information articles matter-of-factly denigrate these in style proposals as “shoot-the-moon coverage concepts” (Washington Submit) that will push the Democratic Social gathering “over a liberal cliff” (New York Occasions). I typically surprise if the pc keyboards in sure newsrooms — moreover letter and quantity keys—have a single key that spits out the 8-word phrase: “too far left to win a common election.”

Sadly, many Democratic voters in Iowa, New Hampshire and elsewhere are unduly influenced by mainstream media, regardless of the punditocracy’s terrible observe document in 2016 and earlier on predicting who’s “electable” in a common election. 

Elite journalists recurrently quote their “knowledgeable” sources within the Democratic institution who categorical worries that if Bernie Sanders wins the nomination, he’ll lose badly in November.  

Or do those that personal or run company media (and company Democrats) have a special fear — that Sanders will win the overall election, shake up the system and take away a few of their wealth and energy?

Jeff Cohen is cofounder of the web activism group RootsAction.org, founding father of the media watch group FAIR, a retired journalism professor, and writer of “Cable Information Confidential: My Misadventures in Company Media.”

Source link

The post Seven Pointed Questions for Corporate Media About Their Biases  appeared first on Down The Middle News.

source https://downthemiddlenews.com/seven-pointed-questions-for-corporate-media-about-their-biases/